True Evolution of a Discovery & The Rise of Antagonism
Wednesday, 4 June 2014
True Evolution of a Discovery & The Rise of Antagonism: True Evolution of a Discovery & the Rise of Antago...
True Evolution of a Discovery & The Rise of Antagonism: True Evolution of a Discovery & the Rise of Antago...: True Evolution of a Discovery & the Rise of Antagonism Blue Beach Fossil Museum, Nova Scotia Canada Written by: Christ...
True Evolution of a Discovery & the Rise of Antagonism - Blue Beach Fossil Museum, Nova Scotia Canada
True Evolution of
a Discovery & the Rise of Antagonism
Blue Beach Fossil Museum, Nova Scotia Canada
Written by: Christpher F. Mansky
The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author, and not necessarily those of others.
Black Forest Point, Blue Beach Nova Scotia
Significant research is still being done at the Blue Beach Fossil Museum in Kings County , Nova Scotia , and this
research still mainly depends on unpaid, un-reimbursed, on-site efforts by a husband
and wife team. The following discussion examines the project at Blue Beach , and compares
this with another similar discovery in New Mexico during the
1980’s. The purpose of this examination is to show the similarity of the
discoveries, and the different ways in which they have been greeted, and to
point out how the Nova Scotia finds have not
received their full measure of respect.
Blue Beach, Track Meet 2012
This was essentially what we understood 19 years ago when the beginnings
of our research vision began to take
form. We believed a longer and more-comprehensive search would prove there was
a huge amount of data waiting to be found. Based on the kinds of fossils that
were turning up in our growing collections, a few of us local enthusiasts
believed Blue Beach contained a
previously-hidden richness beyond everyone’s understanding. The search for the
rest of the Blue Beach story has been a
huge success, with a numbing series of discoveries since 1995. These
discoveries have received full validation in the scientific community since as
early as 2003, with significant media coverage all the while. Our research vision has proven not only
correct in it’s original assumptions, but has exceeded all expectations in
terms of: 1) how many species of tetrapods and fishes we would find bone
evidence of?; 2) how complete and/or well-preserved could some of the skeletal
evidence be?; 3) how abundant, how many layers, and how many kinds of tracks
would we find in this classic geological section?; and 4) how much, if any,
good evidence could be found to paint a fuller picture of the unknown,
softer-bodied invertebrate faunas that can only be conjectured to have existed
alongside these tetrapod ecosystems? In addition to several early reports and
articles in natural history magazines, over 60 newspaper articles have been
written to describe these discoveries and our
new museum proposal. Furthermore, an array of web- and media-based posts
have appeared online for over a decade as we are taking whatever means we can
to get the word out on the importance of these finds. In terms of our research,
the important preliminary findings, along with an up-to-date review of the Blue
Beach paleontology, have now been published (Mansky and Lucas, 2013); first
announced at an international congress of paleontologists in Albuquerque, New
Mexico in May, 2013.
Whenever big discoveries are made, particularly geographically-fixed
treasure-like discoveries such as fossil sites, archaeological sites, etc – the
discoveries have to undergo an evolution of sorts. First comes that moment of discovery, when those who have
just uncovered the thing comprehend its significance. This is phase one of the evolution, or the recognition stage. If the fossil
discovery is rich enough, and impressive enough, it needs to be communicated to
the greater world. The evolution of public awareness of the discovery then
needs to ascend through the following steps. Phase two is the legitimization
stage, where the discoverers seek validation from recognized experts, announce
their finds through the public media, and gather supporters. Phase three is the politicization stage, which occurs when the importance of the
discovery and the discovery site itself attracts the attention of politicians,
who then move in to help with the further study, preservation, and protection
of the project. Lastly, phase four,
or the enculturation stage, usually
follows quickly on the heels of the politicization stage, and includes aspects
like visitor information centers, museums, gift shops, roadside stands,
postcards, t-shirts, bumper stickers, and the like. This last stage marks the
full integration of the geosite into everyday lives, as cultural entities, and
there are numerous examples where geosites have become such entities (e.g.,
Burgess Shale, Drumheller, Joggins, Petrified National Forest ).
The Blue Beach fossil discoveries have provided a unique new window into
ancient terrestrial and nearshore environments, a window into the middle of
Romer’s Gap; fully qualifying it as an important lagerstätte of earliest Carboniferous age (~350 m.y.). The word lagerstätte comes from the German term
meaning ‘place of deposit’, and in geology has come to mean “motherlode”. This
escalation of discovery at Blue Beach reveals the site
contains an enormous potential for renewed study, and these research gains can
meaningfully contribute to longstanding questions in many areas – not solely the
Holy Grail of topics: the vertebrate-conquest
of land by the first terrestrial groups of tetrapods…
Without question, the magnitude of discovery at Blue Beach ranks it as one
of those finds of the decade, and our
evolution of discovery has been
underway for almost twenty years. At this point everyone except that
‘instrumental political body’ understands this natural resource needs a new
museum, and official support (both moral and financial), and needs to move
through phase three and four with no further hurdles.
Blue Beach is a textbook example of what kind of academic hurdles are
encountered whenever private citizens, or ‘amateurs’, are the driving force
behind the big discovery – as opposed to when those with formal training, and
who are deemed to be ‘the experts’ on a subject, are the ones’ discovering it.
There are many precedents where this can be demonstrated to have occurred in
the past, but one in particular stands out like a particularly-strong dèja vu. In 1987, a fossil enthusiast by
the name of Jerry MacDonald discovers a world-class trackway occurrence in the Robledo Mountains of New Mexico : a find that was
immediately recognized and hailed by experts at federal institutions outside of New Mexico , but marginalized
and doubted by the scientific community inside
the state itself. Mr. MacDonald has succeeded in promoting his finds to the
world, and the United States government recognized
their importance by an Act of Congress, transforming the Robledo tracksites
into the Paleozoic Trackways Monument . Jerry’s story is
the subject of his 1994 book “Earth’s First Steps” (Johnson Printing; Boulder , Colorado ), in which he
reflects on his discoveries, on the reactions to his claims, and on the
resulting conflict between his camp and that of the local scientific clique.
At the time when Jerry MacDonald made his first discoveries in the
Robledos he was involved in obtaining his Master’s Degree in Sociology, and was
torn between devoting time to sociology, or to his excavation in the Robledos.
Upon hearing of Jerry’s decision to return to his work in New Mexico , at least for the
time being, his advisor at the university gave him the following piece of
advice, “Look for valuable sociological information everywhere. In everything.
City reactions, community responses, museum involvement. How they work
together, how they don’t”.
Using this opportunity to view the evolution of his discovery from a
sociologist’s point of view, Jerry was able to document a fascinating example
of how the conflicts arise, and what motivations are at play that causes the
non-supporters to take on the roles they take. One is always reminded that
these same discoveries, if made by the experts instead of by private
individuals, would receive immediate acclaim. Throughout the process, between
1987 and 1990, Jerry would comment wryly that “what seemed so horrible to me as
a palaeontologist would be fascinating if I was a sociologist – something that
gave him great comfort during the struggle.
Nicholas Hotton III was an early
supporter of the Robledos discoveries who worked at the Smithsonian Institution
in Washington , and he often
heard Jerry lament about the trouble he was having with the New Mexico scientists in
validating his claims that the site was of great importance, and what they were
saying about him and his work. Hotton tells him this kind of thing happens all
the time, and in fact it sometimes got worse. He said “What was said about [you] would have been said about anybody
who had done what you had done.”
The parallels between the case study of the Robledos and the new Blue Beach discoveries are
remarkable in their many similarities. In both cases the respective areas had
previously undergone studies by professionals, and none of those studies had
recognized the fossil treasures therein for what they were. The existence of a Blue Beach ‘motherlode’ was
never seriously believed – and its eventual discovery as such came from an
amateur and happened in an area that professionals had studied well.
Motivation for the suggestions we are ‘mavericks’, or that the Blue
Beach discoveries are of only ‘minor’ importance, are not based on scientific
reasoning. We hesitate to say “sour grapes”, but the fossil richness of Blue Beach was not known to
any of these scientists – many of whom had already expressed scepticism of the
site’s significance. That the discoveries were being revealed by a husband and
wife team, and not by a large team from a major museum, university, or
government agency. Of equal impressiveness, the finds and museum enterprise of
the ‘upstarts’ at Blue Beach have been accomplished despite the fact that the
resistance still exists after 18 years, demonstrating amazing stamina and
persistence that would make the Jerry MacDonald struggle look short and sweet.
That the Blue Beach discoveries are
arguably even more important than the Robledos phenomenon makes this resistance
seem even less logical. But nonetheless, as Jerry indicated in his story, the
consensus was to adopt a ‘wait and see’ attitude. Those who were not happy with
our discoveries believed we could sustain the museum project and the research
all by ourselves. To this day there is no direct financial aid to the home-based Blue Beach Fossil Museum at the site
today, and the research is still largely dependant on the work of the unpaid, un-reimbursed
husband and wife team.
The question now is obvious. When is the politician, who rides in on his
white horse, marking the completion of phase three, going to get it? It’s not for lack of trying,
because the Blue Beach project and its
many supporters have continuously appealed to their MLA’s, MP’s, to the many
levels of the great bureaucracy, and to private enterprise. Given the evidence,
and all the validation we have garnered from every expert you could ever need
to validate the this effort, we can only say shame
on that. You have ignored the obvious for six-times as long as the New
Mexican authorities ignored Jerry MacDonald. One final note: who are the main
champions behind us at Blue Beach today? Why, they
would be The New Mexico Museum of Natural
History and Science, of course. They have gained an appreciation of their
past mistakes, and they remember well the lessons of Jerry MacDonald.
Thank you for reading!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)